Portal Ratings

Latest Update: 12/18/25

As many as 4,000+ players are expected to enter the 2025-2026 Transfer Portal. Which teams are navigating the portal the best, both in retaining players and adding impact transfers?

The mcillecesports.com transfer rankings factor in the positive* Net Win value of players lost and players added, accounting for all the roster dynamics related to the portal. For detail about specific players and a description of Net Wins, check out the Player Ratings page.

Team :

TeamID :

Rank	Team	Incoming	Outgoing	NetWin Effect	TeamID
1	Air Force	0.00	0.00	0.00	1
2	Alabama	0.00	0.00	0.00	3
3	Arkansas State	0.00	0.00	0.00	8
4	Army	0.00	0.00	0.00	9
5	Baylor	0.00	0.00	0.00	12
6	BYU	0.00	0.00	0.00	17
7	California	0.00	0.00	0.00	18
8	Central Michigan	0.00	0.00	0.00	19
9	Charlotte	0.00	0.00	0.00	20
10	Delaware	0.00	0.00	0.00	26
11	Duke	0.00	0.00	0.00	27
12	Fresno State	0.00	0.00	0.00	34
13	Georgia Southern	0.00	0.00	0.00	36
14	Houston	0.00	0.00	0.00	40
15	JMU	0.00	0.00	0.00	46
16	Louisiana	0.00	0.00	0.00	53
17	Louisville	0.00	0.00	0.00	55
18	MTSU	0.00	0.00	0.00	68
19	Navy	0.00	0.00	0.00	69
20	New Mexico	0.00	0.00	0.00	73
21	Northwestern	0.00	0.00	0.00	78
22	Notre Dame	0.00	0.00	0.00	79
23	Ohio	0.00	0.00	0.00	80
24	Ole Miss	0.00	0.00	0.00	85
25	Pittsburgh	0.00	0.00	0.00	89
26	Rice	0.00	0.00	0.00	91
27	Sam Houston	0.00	0.00	0.00	93
28	Southern Miss	0.00	0.00	0.00	99
29	Syracuse	0.00	0.00	0.00	101
30	Texas A&M	0.00	0.00	0.00	106
31	Texas Tech	0.00	0.00	0.00	108
32	Toledo	0.00	0.00	0.00	109
33	UMASS	0.00	0.00	0.00	118
34	UNLV	0.00	0.00	0.00	119
35	Utah	0.00	0.00	0.00	122
36	Vanderbilt	0.00	0.00	0.00	126
37	Western Michigan	0.00	0.00	0.00	134
38	Coastal Carolina	0.00	0.00	0.00	23
39	ULM	0.00	0.00	0.00	117
40	Kansas	0.00	0.00	0.00	47
41	Stanford	0.00	0.00	0.00	100
42	Western Kentucky	0.00	0.00	0.00	133
43	SMU	0.00	0.01	-0.01	96
44	Indiana	0.00	0.01	-0.01	42
45	Arizona	0.00	0.01	-0.01	5
46	Mississippi State	0.00	0.02	-0.02	65
47	Nevada	0.00	0.02	-0.02	72
48	Ball State	0.00	0.02	-0.02	11
49	San Diego State	0.00	0.02	-0.02	94
50	Kent State	0.00	0.02	-0.02	50
51	UAB	0.00	0.02	-0.02	113
52	UTSA	0.00	0.02	-0.02	125
53	UTEP	0.00	0.02	-0.02	124
54	Illinois	0.00	0.03	-0.03	41
55	Jax State	0.00	0.03	-0.03	45
56	Eastern Michigan	0.00	0.03	-0.03	29
57	Akron	0.00	0.03	-0.03	2
58	Temple	0.00	0.03	-0.03	103
59	Tulane	0.00	0.03	-0.03	111
60	Georgia	0.00	0.04	-0.04	35
61	Arkansas	0.00	0.04	-0.04	7
62	San Jose State	0.00	0.04	-0.04	95
63	FAU	0.00	0.04	-0.04	30
64	Georgia State	0.00	0.05	-0.05	37
65	UCLA	0.00	0.05	-0.05	115
66	South Carolina	0.00	0.05	-0.05	98
67	Michigan	0.00	0.05	-0.05	62
68	Texas State	0.00	0.05	-0.05	107
69	Utah State	0.00	0.06	-0.06	123
70	New Mexico State	0.00	0.06	-0.06	74
71	Iowa State	0.00	0.06	-0.06	44
72	Oklahoma	0.00	0.06	-0.06	82
73	Missouri State	0.00	0.07	-0.07	67
74	Oregon State	0.00	0.07	-0.07	87
75	Kennesaw State	0.00	0.07	-0.07	49
76	Ohio State	0.00	0.07	-0.07	81
77	Miami	0.00	0.07	-0.07	60
78	Troy	0.00	0.08	-0.08	110
79	Miami (OH)	0.00	0.08	-0.08	61
80	Northern Illinois	0.00	0.09	-0.09	77
81	Boston College	0.00	0.09	-0.09	14
82	Colorado State	0.00	0.09	-0.09	25
83	LSU	0.00	0.09	-0.09	56
84	Boise State	0.00	0.10	-0.10	13
85	Buffalo	0.00	0.10	-0.10	16
86	Bowling Green	0.00	0.10	-0.10	15
87	Oregon	0.00	0.11	-0.11	86
88	Wyoming	0.00	0.11	-0.11	136
89	USF	0.00	0.11	-0.11	121
90	Penn State	0.00	0.12	-0.12	88
91	Kentucky	0.00	0.12	-0.12	51
92	Liberty	0.00	0.12	-0.12	52
93	Tulsa	0.00	0.13	-0.13	112
94	Maryland	0.00	0.13	-0.13	58
95	Iowa	0.00	0.13	-0.13	43
96	Virginia	0.00	0.13	-0.13	127
97	NC State	0.00	0.13	-0.13	70
98	Hawaii	0.00	0.15	-0.15	39
99	FIU	0.00	0.16	-0.16	31
100	Clemson	0.00	0.16	-0.16	22
101	Wake Forest	0.00	0.16	-0.16	129
102	Louisiana Tech	0.00	0.17	-0.17	54
103	Washington State	0.00	0.17	-0.17	131
104	Rutgers	0.00	0.17	-0.17	92
105	Colorado	0.00	0.18	-0.18	24
106	Virginia Tech	0.00	0.19	-0.19	128
107	Marshall	0.00	0.20	-0.20	57
108	South Alabama	0.00	0.21	-0.21	97
109	Memphis	0.00	0.21	-0.21	59
110	West Virginia	0.00	0.21	-0.21	132
111	UCF	0.00	0.22	-0.22	114
112	Wisconsin	0.00	0.22	-0.22	135
113	Minnesota	0.00	0.23	-0.23	64
114	USC	0.00	0.27	-0.27	120
115	East Carolina	0.00	0.30	-0.30	28
116	Florida	0.00	0.32	-0.32	32
117	Purdue	0.00	0.33	-0.33	90
118	Washington	0.00	0.34	-0.34	130
119	TCU	0.00	0.35	-0.35	102
120	Nebraska	0.00	0.36	-0.36	71
121	App State	0.00	0.38	-0.38	4
122	Michigan State	0.00	0.38	-0.38	63
123	Florida State	0.00	0.39	-0.39	33
124	UCONN	0.00	0.41	-0.41	116
125	Old Dominion	0.00	0.41	-0.41	84
126	Kansas State	0.00	0.42	-0.42	48
127	Oklahoma State	0.00	0.42	-0.42	83
128	Tennessee	0.00	0.47	-0.47	104
129	Georgia Tech	0.00	0.53	-0.53	38
130	North Carolina	0.00	0.60	-0.60	75
131	Texas	0.00	0.62	-0.62	105
132	North Texas	0.00	0.69	-0.69	76
133	Missouri	0.00	0.70	-0.70	66
134	Cincinnati	0.00	0.79	-0.79	21
135	Arizona State	0.00	0.82	-0.82	6
136	Auburn	0.00	0.87	-0.87	10
	Team				TeamID

If the table fails to load on mobile, switch to desktop view.

Column Information

Rank: Current Transfer Portal rank, as of the Latest Update listed above.
Team: All 136 FBS teams.
Incoming: Total positive Net Win value of incoming transfers.
Outgoing: Total positive Net Win value of outgoing transfers.
NetWin Effect: Incoming minus Outgoing. The expected net wins added or lost for an average FBS team, based on a 12-game schedule, an average schedule difficulty, and an average roster. See the Player Ratings page for more information about the standardization of the NetWin statistic.
TeamID: Unique numeric identifier. Useful for filtering teams with similar names, like Michigan and Western Michigan.

*Two principles guided the decision to use only positive Net Win values in the team rankings:

Teams are not rewarded for losing players. I.e., in these rankings, there is no “addition by subtraction.”
Teams are not punished for adding players. I.e., in these rankings, there is no “subtraction by addition.”

Despite these two principles, there is an implicit opportunity cost, given limited roster slots. For example, if a team with room for one quarterback adds a QB with negative NetWin, that won’t explicitly affect the team’s ranking. However, had the team added a +NetWin QB instead, they would’ve been ranked higher.